Comparing the Performance of the HJ and GF Earth Observation Satellites

October 15, 2021

Are you curious about the HJ and GF Earth Observation satellites? Do you want to know how the two compare in terms of their performance? If so, you've come to the right place! In this post, the Flare Compare Team will provide an unbiased, factual comparison of these two satellites.

Overview

The HJ and GF Earth Observation satellites are remote sensing satellites developed and launched by China. The HJ series is short for "Huan Jing," which translates to "environment" in English. The GF series, on the other hand, stands for "Gaofen," which means "high-resolution" in English. Both satellites are primarily used for environmental monitoring, natural resource management, and disaster response.

Resolution and Swath Width

The HJ-1A and HJ-1B satellites have a resolution of 30 meters and a swath width of 720 kilometers. The HJ-1C satellite has a resolution of 1 meter and a swath width of 38 kilometers. In comparison, the GF-1 and GF-2 satellites have a resolution of 2 meters and 1 meter, respectively. The swath width for both the GF-1 and GF-2 is 24 kilometers.

Spectral Range

The HJ-1A, HJ-1B, and HJ-1C satellites have a spectral range of 0.4 to 0.9 micrometers. The GF-1 satellite has a spectral range of 0.45 to 0.90 micrometers, whereas the GF-2 satellite has a broader spectral range of 0.45 to 0.95 micrometers.

Launch Date and Cost

The HJ-1A, HJ-1B, and HJ-1C satellites were launched in September 2008, November 2008, and November 2012, respectively. The GF-1 satellite was launched in April 2013, and the GF-2 satellite was launched in December 2014. In terms of cost, the HJ-1A, HJ-1B, and HJ-1C satellites cost approximately $123 million, whereas the GF-1 and GF-2 satellites cost approximately $95 million and $197 million, respectively.

Conclusion

As we have seen, the HJ and GF Earth Observation satellites have their unique features and applications. While the HJ series has better swath width and spectral range, the GF series has a better resolution. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific application and requirements. We hope this comparison has helped shed some light on the performance of these two satellites.

References


© 2023 Flare Compare